Thursday, March 23, 2006

Drivers Need to Smarten Up

I have long been an advocate of improving our roads and transit. It has recently come to my attention that the government is not 100% to blame for the sorry state our Ontario's roads but rather the people using them.

In the last week, I have noticed several problems. Most common of which involve running red lights, speeding, driving too slow, illegal turns/Uturns, tail gating, the list goes on. Driving on the roads today has become a terror as people are treating the rules of the road more as 'guidelines' rather than rules written in stone. The biggest culprets are people driving larger vehicles, as they seem to have a false sense of security in them. Some have even gotten daring enough to try and take on city buses and tractor trailers in their Hummers. Surprisingly the bohemouth of all non-commerical/military vehicles will be crushed like an aluminum can if it hits one of those, turning the occupants into human apple sauce in the process.

So what has caused this disreguard for other drivers', and their own lives while on the road. I've identified three areas.

The 'Me' Attitude: Me, me, me, me, me.... Me first, I have to get their first, out of my way! This is how a lot of people think when behind the wheel of their car. They forget its not a race and if they just calm down, traffic will actually move faster. They choose not to follow the rules of the road because they are "inconvinient" for them. This type is usually the one driving the larger vehicles.

Everything But Driving: People seem more interested in talking to their friends on the phone, or playing with the radio, or doing their hair than driving. Driving distracted is just as bad as driving drunk, as studies have shown.

Poor Training: I have to question the practices of the driving schools. How are the larger ones teaching these kids? How do these people even get a licence? Some people drive vehicles they are not used to or treat larger vehicles as if they were a lot smaller.

Now, what do do, here are my suggestions.
-Force drivers of large vehicles (mid to large SUVs, minivans) to get an F class licence.
-Ban cell phones while driving
-Put more cops and red light cameras on the road to catch them in the act. Increase punishments for more dangerous offences such as drunk driving.
read more...

Held Hostage

In the news today, the Canadian and British hostages being held in Iraq since November 2005 have been released. This is good news but brings up some questions about the war torn country.

I am not here to express whether I approve of the US being in Iraq. I have decided to remain neutral on the subject as neither pro or anti war side is right or wrong. I am here to look at stupidity.

I know little about the Christian Peacemakers. They seem to be a passivist group made up of mennonites and quakers. I am not here to judge their work, but rather why they are there in the first place. A lot of people seem to misunderstand the actual danger during a war. They may strongly believe in the peaceful teachings of Christ and Ghandi but a masked guerrilla with an AK-47 may have something different to say. The ideology behind Islamic extemism is not anti-US , it is not anti-West or anti-East. They feel that all non-Muslims are painted with the same brush. They all feel that every person that comes in who is not Islamic is the devil. Thus those silly enough to venture into these areas unarmed and unescorted find themselves kidnapped. The world is unfortnately not a peachy keen place. Is is simply wise for these people to stay out and find other places to help.
read more...

Saturday, March 18, 2006

Traffic in Milton: 6 Months Later

6 months ago (back when I was on Myblogsite, you can find the original post in the November Archive), I posted a rather lengthy article on traffic problems in Milton. I was looking at it and noticed that little has changed. I'll refer back to some of my original complaints and we'll see what has been done.

Laurier & Ontario
What's Been Done: Nothing
This crooked intersection still presents a bad left turn hazzard.

Ontario Street:
What's Been Done: Nothing
Still a bad area for speeding

Bronte and Steels
What's Been Done: Nothing
Railbridge blocking view still poses a hazzard. No planes for lights.
UPDATE 04/18/06: Study being done that will hopefully set up a plan to fix the bridge problem. Road to be widened.

Steels Between Martin and Ontario
What's Been Done: Nothing
Speed limit still too low

Britainnia Road
What's Been Done: Nothing
Spring has arrived and the cyclists are back out in full force.

Steels and Wheelabrator
What's Been Done: Nothing
There is still a turning hazzard here do to lack of lights

Laurier and Vanier
What's Been Done: Nothing
Needs a four way stop, no plans to do so.

Dairy Road
What's Been Done: Widening has begun.
Widening the road is all fine and dandy but the construction company working on it is doing an extremely poor job.

Dairy and Fourth Line
What's Been Done: Nothing
Work has yet to begin on the James Snow extension. No word on when that will start.

Tramaine and Steels
What's Been Done: Nothing

Dairy and Ontario
What's Been Done: Nothing
Still no turn signals

James Snow and Highway 401
What's Been Done: Lights are going up
Light poles were put up but there are no lights on them. Poles were put up two months ago.

Highway 25 and Britannia
What's Been Done: Nothing
Still no turning lanes

Railway Grade Separations
What's Been Done: Grade separation beginning on Thompson.
However, no plans for any others.
UPDATE 04/18/06: Study being done for a grade separation on Main St at the mall.

Well it seems the town is starting to get stuff done but are far from any concrete traffic improvements. Traffic is worse than ever.
read more...

Saturday, March 11, 2006

Copywrong

Recently, the RIAA and other similar organizations have told Canada we need to chage our copyright laws for the new digital age. I say go to hell.

If anybody has even looked at the demands of these organizations, you know something is fishy. I'll give a couple of examples.

Music: I buy a CD and I really like a song on it. I want to put that song on my MP3 player. Based on the demands, I'd have to purchase that song from a download site in order to legally put it on my MP3 player.

Movies: I want to convert a DVD into DivX format so I can watch it on my laptop during a long flight. I don't want to bring the disc with me incase it might be stolen. It would be illegal for me to do this as decrypting DVD format is piracy.

Software: I own two computers with CD burners. I've just purchased some CD burning software. In order to be legal, I'd have to buy two copies of the boxed version to be legal as the company doesn't sell individual licences.

Does any of this make sense? I say no, it doesn't. I equate it to Honda telling me I can't put better wheels or a supercharger in my car because it's their design and they own it, even if I've made all my payments on it. As long as somebody is not selling or giving it away, they should be free to do what ever they want with software for their own personal use.

But wait, it gets better. Soon we will be able to purchase HD movies. Now if you have an HDTV made before 2003 or any computer currently on the market, you will not be able to play these discs. Why? DRM, or digital rights management. It's a broad term for invasive copy protection that includes spyware, rootkits, and other nasties that mess up your computer, and it's all perfectly legal. Computers and TVs will require a special DRM chip to play these movies. No computers have this chip and only TVs made after 2003 do.

Copyright today is copywrong. These people should not be punishing consumers because some triad in Hong Kong is making priated copies of their stuff.
read more...

Thursday, March 09, 2006

Child Care Begins at Home

I've been very critical of the proposed childcare plane the Liberals and the NDP have developed. They are still pushing it but I do not think it is a good idea. Besides the unconstitutionality of a federal run system, there are other flaws.

I'm putting on my social commentary hat on for this post. A family friend has her father in a government subsidised nursing home. It was found out that the nurses were neglecting this poor old man. It got me thinking, if seniors are being mistreated in these subsidised nursing homes, how will kids be treated in subsidised day cares.

Socialized daycare is a symptom of a much larger problem with raising children in today's society. A lot of mothers are now working these days, if not most. I have nothing against working moms but I find that children are getting ignored. The parent has worked all day, they're tired and want 'me' time. The child gets parked infront of the Xbox or the TV while the parent lazes away. This is why kids are so messed up. They spend more quality time with electronic equipment than their own parents. Kids are often put below a dog in terms of priority. They start to run wild and parents question what went wrong. Dads are just as guilty as the moms in all this.

Socialized daycare acts as a place for lazy parents to stuff their kids and forget about them for a few hours. Basically a baby prison. When they get out of the big baby house they get stuffed into some sporting event for another few hours. In many cases, kids may only end up seeing their parents for less than two hours per day. It's not really fair to the kids. Parents, you don't have to give up your career, just spend some quality time with the child and they will grow up right.

As for daycare, the best place for the child is with a relative or friend. If you must resort to daycare, look for the best one you can afford. If your office has a daycare program, then that's the ideal route as you can even visit your child during breaks. Based on the state of most social institutions in this country, you don't want to let the government babysit them.
read more...

Wednesday, March 08, 2006

The War is On

This week the Ontario Union of Public Employees (OPSU) has declared war on students. They have walked off the job putting college student's future in jeopardy. They have also welcomed tuition fee hikes.

I think I can speak for most students and I'm declaring war on the greedy college teachers and those who try to bleed money out of struggling students. College students, I propose you resort to your right to peaceful protest. Set up counterpickets across the road from your striking teachers and let them hear your grivences loud and clear.

The college teachers are putting their student's futures in jeopardy. Kids are loosing their year, they are loosing their money, and if the year is pushed into summer, they may even loose out on education as they can't work to afford it. They favour tuition increases to fulfill their greedy demands for more money (they already make over $90,000) and smaller class sizes that are already a lot smaller than their university counterparts. This is rediculous. It's time for my fellow students to fight back.
read more...

Friday, March 03, 2006

Live and Let Die

Besides gays, scientology, and starving Africans kids, celebrities have hopped on yet another band wagon, animal rights.

Former Beatle and Wings member Paul McCartney visited Newfoundland yesterday in a bid to put a stop to the seal hunt. He says it's cruel and barbaric to hunt the seals. I think it's cruel and barbaric to hear McCartney talk. Paul is a washed up has-been who's star burned out in the 1980s when Wings broke up. McCartney is a vegitarian (as evident in a famous Simpsons episode). He is also a very vocal personality when it comes to animal rights and the legalization of the giggle grass.

What McCartney is mad at this time is the Harp Seal hunt in Newfoundland. The hunt important, particularly to First Nations people who rely on it for food, clothing, and income. Although the seals are adorable, I think we must think about humans first. There are limits on how many can be hunted.

This brings me to the whole idea of animal rights, and clothing. I once had a teacher who lived with an Algonquin tribe near Kenora. He stated that using an animal's fur or skin is the most natural form of clothing and he hated those who thought otherwise. I agree. As long as we don't overhunt, why not. Do you think cavemen went around naked? I don't think it's McCartney's right to go over and protest the way people live their lives. That can only be changed by democratic process, as we are a democratic country the last time I checked. He has never even lived in Canada as far as I know. Celebrities do it for publicity and that's it. I don't protest the fact that Paul probably does love animals but I don't think he should be coming over here and dictating.

Perhaps if celebrities want to make a difference, perhaps they should work on their talent. I haven't seen a good movie since 2003.
read more...

Thursday, March 02, 2006

Ban Me

I've been playing video games since I was eight. Games were fun back then and relatively non violent. Characters like Sonic and Mario lit up our TV screens. I remember the fuss that the original Doom caused when it first came out. Everybody thought shooting cheesey looking monsters was going to drive our kids nuts and go on shooting sprees. I remember Columbine, when Doom was blamed for teaching the killers how to shoot.

It is now 2006, some eleven years after Doom 1 came out. Video games have only gotten more violent. Some people protested about Doom 3, which is a pussy cat compaired to some. Games like Grand Theft Auto where its ok to shoot cops and pick up hookers are very popular these days. The latest game to come under fire is called "25 to Life". It's a console game so I've never played it. Apparently it takes a more violent spin on cops and robbers where you either are a cop that kills robbers or a robber who kills cops. The latter has upset various police associations. They want the game banned. They say it glorifies a life of crime and teaches kids to hate cops.

HOLD ON THERE. Teaches kids? This game has been rated M (Mature) by the ESRB, which regulares games. It's similar to the stickers that the MPAA puts on movies. An M rated game is similar to an R rated movie. Only for people 17 and older. Are kids getting their hands on these games? Most definately, but how, why? Some people say that stores sell the games to minors. Stores are pretty good about not doing that as they don't want to get into trouble, or possible sued. Game makers? No, same reason as stores. Parents? YES! There is a fine line between reality and fantasy and it gets more blurry the younger kids are. Adults know games like 25 to Life are not real. Kids may not, especially when their parents use Xbox as a babysitter. They are buying these kids the games and then whine when they are too violent and their kid starts acting out. They never told the kid that that stuff was not real in the first place.

Now for the possile ban. I think banning a video game is very dangerous. It is censorship by the government. Banning it for kids is ok, but not for everybody. The government should not be making those kind of decisions or else we fall into totalitarianism. We should not allow a small group of people tell us what we should read, see, and hear. What people need to know is the magic of the off button. If you don't want your kids playing the game or watching that program, or reading this article, turn it off. If you don't want to see it, turn it off. Nobody if forcing anybody to buy or even look at this stuff. That's the power of choice. We should not ban things. It's about time that people started using more common sense regarding this stuff.
read more...

Supreme Idiots

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court has rules that school boards cannot ban Sihk daggers from the classroom. For those who don't know, the Sikhs are the warrior class of India. Young Sikh men carry with them a cerimonial dagger known as a Kirpan.

Several school boards in Quebec have attempted to ban students form carring these daggers to school. It's not often I agree with Quebecers but I can this time around. This is because this 'kirpan' is a weapon. It has been said that there have been no incidents with one but that's not the point. There were no incidences of a kid dying of anaphilactic shock at schools I went to but we still couldn't bring peanut butter sandwiches to school. I couldn't bring a knife to cut an apple at lunch for the same reason. The point is that they do pose a serious potential danger. Unless they are dull enough to not even cut butter, which I doubt they are as I've seen these at bazzars in Toronto, they pose a safety risk. I advocate all or none. If a Sikh kid can bring a dagger to school, why can't a white or black kid do the same? The right to security of the person must trump the right to freedom of religion, especially when young kids are concerned. If I were Quebec, I'd be whipping out my Section 33.

This also calls for something stronger to trump the Supreme Court as they are not an infalible body. When you get a unanimous decision like that, questions need to be asked, especially when lower courts declared the opposite decision using the 'reasonable limits' clause.
read more...