Showing posts with label Misc.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Misc.. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

A Republican Win's Teddy's Old Seat In Mass.

I think hell just froze over. I guess this is why the United States has been getting so much snow this winter. Republican Scott Brown has taken the Massachusetts Senate seat long held by recently deceased senator Edward "Ted" Kennedy. The state is considered to be a left-wing Democratic stronghold. Though this will be little more than a footnote in Canadian news, it represents a significant even in American politics. Kennedy, a life long and unabashed liberal, held that seat for 46 years. Teddy was a larger than life figure in American politics so if his supporters turncoat, things cannot be good. It's a major blow to the Obama administration. Many Americans are worried over the health reform bill and potential tax increases. Polls estimate that 54% of Americans are opposed to the health care plan. Obama has gone from an approval rating of 84% by the time he was entered office (according to a CNN poll), down to a low of 41% just last month.

It's notable that in such a short period, less than a year, things have shifted from one of the strongest Democratic showings in over a decade to at the election to a point where no seat is safe. It will be interesting to see how the Obama administration reacts to this.
read more...

Sunday, December 20, 2009

Study Explains Liberals, Religious Right in a Nutshell

The universal explanation as to why liberals are stuck up idiots and why the religious right does the bad things that they do.

"The study, said Mazar, an assistant professor of marketing with the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management, builds on research into the idea of “moral regulation” — that people either consciously or unconsciously balance bad deeds with good ones.

“What has been shown so far is that when we engage in actions that give us some kind of moral, warm glow — let’s call it that — that afterwards we are more likely to transgress,” Mazar said."

Source: CNEWS

read more...

Monday, October 12, 2009

The Best Political Shows: Penn & Teller's Bullshit

I thought I'd do a rundown on some of the best political shows on TV. Not the serious programs for a change but instead those that make light of politics. Today, we're looking at Penn & Teller's Bullshit. The show airs on The Movie Network's main station (Bell TV channel 300/840) Thursdays at 11pm.

In Bullshit, Penn Jilette and his partner Teller take commonly held beliefs and debunk them. The show is unabashedly biased with a heavy libertarian slant. The show always keeps this out in the open though, unlike so many others. The episodes follow a current affairs documentary format with a comic twist. Use of swearing, crude jokes, and even nudity are all there to prove a point. In a typical episode Penn & Teller will take a misconception or controversial topic, express their viewpoint, and interview those who support & oppose them. The show tends to take a far deeper look at people who do not support their argument. The duo then make fun of them and support their position with facts presented in an academic manner.

The show has covered topics ranging from silly misconceptions such as colonics, lawns, and hair, to more serious topics such as terrorism, cults, drugs, and climate change. It's different from the usual current affairs shows as it mixes serious issues with humour without being overbearing. It's also rare in that it's overtly biased but neither conservative or liberal. Teller has admitted that the duo think their own show is bullshit in that regard, which will likely be the focus of their final episode. However, the show is vary fair in its presentation. Bullshit won a Writers Guild of America award for best comedy/talk show in 2004 and has been nominated for Emmy Awards for outstanding reality and writing several years running. It's one of the best current affairs shows on TV right now and is definitely worth checking out.

Here's one full episode from Season 2 about People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. It's been broken down into four parts. Below is part one.

read more...

Friday, October 09, 2009

Obama Wins Peace Prize?

Even the liberals I know were scratching their heads over this one. Obama has won the Nobel Peace Prize. What did he do? "Gave hope for peace." Right... He hasn't done anything, at all, except show up to work. I think it's time we did away with the peace prize. The Nobel Prize was originally supposed to award people in the field of science. At this point, the peace prize has only serves to represent the Nobel Committee's political soapbox. How would you feel if you were a top diplomat brokering major peace deals and got passed up for the likes of Obama, or Al Gore. Well, at least with Obama, they're pretending he did something to advance world peace. I still can't figure out why they felt Gore deserved it.
read more...

Saturday, October 03, 2009

Things I've Learned...

We each have our own life experiences, here's a few things I've learned in mine...

-People believe what they want to believe:
In other words, it's difficult to convince people you're right and they're wrong, and vice versa.

-Love yourself unconditionally, because nobody else does:
All our relationships in life come with strings attached. If you don't love yourself, who else will?

-Life doesn't reward those who wait:
People spend their entire lives waiting and where does it get them? It gets them a book of lost dreams as thick as the NYC phone directory. Seize the day.

-Don't take anything at face value:
Just because someone isn't lying doesn't mean they're telling the truth.

-Don't be afraid to challenge your beliefs:
Goes with the above.

-Money talks:
Everyone has a price, make sure you set yours high.

-Faith is a crutch:
Some need it, some don't. There is nothing wrong with either as long as you don't become over zealous about it. Those that do are the true lost souls.

-People are always looking for ways to label you a deviant:
Whenever you engage in an activity or relationship that certain political stripes don't approve of, you'll always get attacked for it. The attacks don't always come from the usual suspects either.

-Try the wine:
Eat well, eat plenty, eat with friends. It's there isn't it?

-We're all going to die eventually:
Don't get worked up about all these "studies" that label common household objects as potential killers, or that the apocalypse is coming. At best, you're only delaying the inevitable by maybe a day or two max. You're more likely to die of confusion first.

-Japanese people are weird and uptight:
...but they still know how to have fun, and they don't care that the rest of the world thinks they're strange.

-Give me liberty or give me death:
I'd rather be destitute and free, instead of rich and under the boot of some despot

-Deadlines are for sissies:
Better the job be late and right than wrong and on time

-Gotta make the morning last:
Slow down and make time for yourself. You're not there to serve everyone's beckon call 24/7.

-Can't buy me love:
Wanting to be kind and caring for a woman you like doesn't win you girlfriends these days. In my experience, few take notice and fewer care. However, it still feels a heck of a lot better than the alternatives.

-Some breathing room:
Seems to me that most relationships end because one partner refuses to accept the other as an individual. It's ok to go your separate ways, have separate lives and friends, as long as you're back together in love at the end of the day.

-You can't spell shallow without hallow:
Despite what conventional Hollywood wisdom tells us, relationships based on sex are hallow and will never succeed.

-Some people exist just to piss you and everyone else off:
So you might as well have a little fun and make their lives a living hell while you're at it.

-I take that personally!:
Canadian politics is a never ending battle over who can shout the loudest, or who can claim to be the most offended.

-"I am a man who does not exist for others."
From The Fountainhead, by Ayn Rand

-It's ok to be afraid
A fear of hurting the ones you care about can create road blocks in your life, but this isn't necessarily a bad thing.

-Have a hug:
Hug someone you care about at least once a day

-Death is not liberating:
Live life as if there is no heaven. You probably won't see those people again, so cherish what you do have.

-Laugh at other people's failures...
...because they're definitely laughing at yours.

-It's never a good time to keep your mouth shut:
Debate is mankind's greatest gift. Nothing is ever settled.
read more...

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Organic Food Has No Health Benefits?

Well there's another big shot at the greenies who have been pushing the eat local, eat organic mantra as both a healthier and more eco friendly lifestyle. A large study conducted by the UK's Food Standards Agency has found that organic food showed no difference in nutritional value or evidence of additional health benefits over regular produce. The findings back up a similar study published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. The Soil Association, a UK based environmental group which promotes sustainable eating is cautioning against the results, regardless of them being proven with proper scientific method by two separate and independent studies. The data also supports an investigation by ABC's 20/20 several years ago (when organic labelled food first started appearing) that examined organic and regular produce for toxins. The small study found that there was little difference and that organics could actually harbour more harmful bacteria. The conclusion, always wash your produce no matter how it was grown.

So why discuss this on a politics blog. Well, organic food has been a bit of a political football lately. Remember the whole fuss over raw milk earlier this year despite countless scientific studies, backed by the UN, which labelled it as a hazardous product? They used the same "less chemicals better for you" line even though pasteurization only heats the milk to kill bacteria and nothing else is added. One of the biggest problems concerning organic food is a lack of regulation. Currently, there are no set laws in Canada and the US which dictate exactly what can and what cannot be labelled organic. Therefore, something could be called organic and may not be. With consumers being asked to pay more for organic food, which has now been proven to have dubious health benefits, it's time to get some labelling regulation in place whether farmers like it or not. The current system is akin to gouging or selling snake oil.

Source: BBC News
read more...

Monday, July 27, 2009

Cartoon Warren Buffett to Teach Kids About Finance

Ah, somethings you know are just awful ideas when you hear them. Remember how his constant idiotic sky is falling rhetoric kept crashing the stock market earlier this year? He may be one of the world's richest men but he's hardly the sharpest knife in the drawer. Just another suit who got lucky. So you're going to put him in an internet cartoon to teach kids about finance. "Ok kids, each time the market goes down, panic and pull all your money out!" Smart. (rolls eyes)

Here's a link to the Calgary Herold article about it.

(I just realized I've been spelling his name Buffet all this time. I must have been hungry when I wrote those articles. lol)
read more...

Monday, July 20, 2009

The Final Frontier

Today is the 40th anniversary of the Neil Armstrong talking that first step on the surface of the Moon. In 1961, John F. Kennedy had made a pledge to land an American on the moon and bring him back safely by the decade was out. NASA then kicked into overdrive to build a rocket and assemble teams that could accomplish the task. The moon landing still remains controversial to this day. There are still a great deal who believe it was a hoax preformed on a sound stage, just don't tell Buzz Aldrin that or him sock you one. Others look at the countless billions we've supposedly wasted on the space program, with the moon landing being a classic example. Social justice crusaders saw it as $6.5 billion (at the time) thrown away for the sole purpose of gaining oneupmanship over the Soviet Union. The reality of the Moon landing was far more than that to the eyes of the public back in '69. The Vietnam War was in high gear, social upheaval & violent revolution was gripping the world, and nuclear apocalypse seemed as likely as it ever did. After witnessing so much destruction, the world needed something to look up on. When the Saturn V rocket blasted off the launch pad, America cheered. When the Eagle landed on the Moon, the world cheered. Two men walked on an alien world, the greatest accomplishment in the history of man. They were not Americans, they were humans. It was not an accomplishment of America but an accomplishment of the entire world. For eight days in 1969, the world's heart beat as one. Something it had never done before and something it has not done since. Armstrong, Aldrin, and Collins were not just astronauts, they were great uniters, whether they realized it or not. It was the first time mankind could see pictures of Earth live on TV, looking so small and distant, and realize that we were all in this together on the blue marble.

Since the cancellation of the Apollo program, interest in space travel has waned significantly, and has only become more controversial. NASA's shuttle program is hardly awe inspiring. A few days in low-earth orbit to study the effects of micro gravity on tiny screws, or something to that tune. The loss of Columbia and Challenger only raised more questions as to whether the program is worth it. The International Space Station has also been a dismal failure. After 11 years, with the estimated construction completion date being in 2003, it is nowhere near being finished. NASA plans to de-orbit the station in 2016, a mere five years after it's new completion date. Many question the need for manned space missions, and the financial argument still comes up frequently. Socialists feel that the money be better spent on social justice missions and wealth redistribution, to make life for people on Earth better. It's a vary narrow view of what the space program has provided us though. A debate on CTV Newsnet last night on the issue highlighted the fact that trillions of dollars have been spent on various bailouts of banks and the auto industry. The $100 billion spent on the space program seems like a bargain next to that. Indeed it has been considering what has come out of it. Next time you turn on any communications device, remember that your signal is probably being bounced off a satellite somewhere. No space program would make global communication not impossible but extremely difficult and significantly more costly. There would be no GPS; making transportation more difficult not only for you but also airlines, ships, trucking companies, and search & rescue. Advanced medical imaging, cordless tools, improved baby foods, composite materials (carbon fibre, advanced polymers) , scratch resistant glass, smoke detectors, Velcro, better sun glasses, better solar energy collection, recycling systems, and pace makers can all be directly attributed to the space program. Stuff that benefits people around the world every day. All this innovation could pay for the space program several times over. Through programs like Hubble and Apollo, we have also been able to learn significantly more about our universe than we ever would without them. Who would have guessed that the Moon is possibly a fragment of Earth?

Then there's simply the sheer wonder of what we can achieve. Like the moon landing, it can bring the world together. Mankind is hardwired to explore and learn more about their universe. It's human nature, it drives us. Whether you agree with colonialism or not, the age of exploration benefited Western European nations enormously. China has enjoyed the same success, with Zheng He becoming their Columbus. That was until the empire lapsed back into isolationism with a bar on maritime trade around the late Ming era. China soon quickly fell behind Europe. Simply put, we need to push out into the world to maintain our civilization. Space travel is the next logical step. We need to go back to the Moon and push towards Mars is we want to survive. Buzz Aldrin is also advocating the push to Mars. Humanity needs to step forward, and not make that one small step the last.
read more...

Thursday, June 18, 2009

PETA Finally Goes Right Round the Bend

You thought PETA (People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals) couldn't get any more bizarre. Apparently you thought wrong. Earlier this week, US president Barack Obama swatted a fly that was disrupting him during an interview with NBC. The animal rights group came out today announcing that they were vary disappointed in the president for doing that. The group's spokesman Bruce Friedrich said that ""We support compassion even for the most curious, smallest and least sympathetic animals, we believe that people, where they can be compassionate, should be, for all animals." Friedrich went on to say that while they approved of Obama's voting record on animal rights "swatting a fly on TV indicates he's not perfect, and we're happy to say that we wish he hadn't." PETA suggested that he should have used a more humane method that allows flies to be trapped and released outside. I had often joked that PETA would soon equate swatting flies to murder. Now I can say that they finally have. This is just too funny. PETA members really need to find something better to do with their time.

Source: CNEWS
read more...

Sunday, June 07, 2009

Radio MMN

The beauty of the Internet is being able to produce content free of charge. If you're cheap like me, that's great. It's what's kept this blog going for four years now. I've been toying with the idea of adding a multimedia feature to MMN or MMNTech. I got the idea to do an enhanced podcast as a project of mine just to see how it works out and what kind of interest it generates (likely none. lol).
I'm in the planning stages of it right now but I have worked out a loose format. Each episode, I'll discuss two or three current events topics just like any pundit show. No schedule. It will be done when its done if it gets done. Here's the plan for my first episode.

Episode 1: Food For Thought

-Food Inc.
Discuss the topics Robert Kenner brings up in his new documentary Food Inc. Why are we so afraid of industrialized agriculture? Is Ronald McDonald really the spawn of Pennywise? Plus my secret to good health and why I will relish my 30th birthday when it comes.

-Places to Mow (Down)
Is the 2005 Places to Grow Act of Ontario accelerating urban sprawl? Is the Greenbelt just a myth? Why is it that "Big Mayonnaise" seems to be the only realistic organization fighting sprawl? Plus a look at the issue of broken municipal planning and I rant about my fence.

read more...

Monday, April 20, 2009

New Tax System for Canada: The Party Tax

I was thinking about Michael Ignatiff's comments that Canada should raise taxes during a recession, and about Dalton McGuinty's 8% tax increase. People on the left seem to be all about taxes and are quite content to pay more. Therefore, I've devised a new tax system for Canada which I'm calling the Party Tax.

The Party Tax does away with all conventional tax systems such as tiered income taxes that vary depending on your income bracket. Instead, the Party Tax is a flat tax which is paid depending on who you vote for. Here's the formula.

Vote Liberal: Liberals enjoy paying taxes and don't mind when they are increased. In fact, I'd say they're eager to fork out more. They're the first to demand Canadians pay their fair share whenever the government spends too much on some harebrained scheme. I think they need to pay more of their fair share since they're responsible for most of those schemes. They can obviously afford to divert a larger portion of their income to the government than most Canadians do. After all, they're the ones who demand the most government expenses. Therefore, under the Party Tax, all Liberals would pay at least 50% of their income.

Vote NDP: The New Democrats are all about helping the poor and they like to spend like water as well. At least their causes are somewhat more noble if misguided, unlike the Liberals who love spending cash on their pet projects. NDPers are also technically fuctionally retarded so they shouldn't have to pay as much as their wealthier Liberal counterparts. All NDP voters would pay a flat rate of 45% of their income.

Vote Conservative: Conservatives spend money more sensibly so they can be trusted to invest their cash into the economy. Therefore, their money is not really needed for the government and should be diverted to the private sector, which employs most of the NDPers. (Most Liberals work for government or for a friend in government) Since they're pumping so much to keep the rest afloat already, they should pay less tax. Therefore, all Conservatives should pay a flat rate of 5% of their income.

Vote Bloc: The Parti for Quebec, Bloc members don't really care about Canada so why should they pay to take care of it. Instead, they should pay a flat rate of 100% of their income to the Quebec provincial government to keep their greedy "nation" afloat.
read more...

Monday, April 13, 2009

Wasting Green on Green: The Tale of the $120 Rain Barrel

Now for something completely different. Canadian Tire is selling a 180L rain barrel for $120, on sale this week for a pittance of $100! It's being marketed as a "green" alternative that could save up to 40% on your summer water bill. (we all know that "up to 40%" usually means somewhere in the ball park of 0%-1%) This is the perfect example on wasting green on green. Rather than just picking on this company for charging an outrageous amount of money for something so simple, I've decided to take up the challenge and make something myself that's identical for half the cost.

The nuts and bolts of this expensive barrel seems to be what amounts to a plastic garbage can & spigot and something to connect it to a downspout. I don't need one as big as 180L so I decided to go with either a 121L (32 gal) or 77L (21gal) plastic garbage can, which can be obtained at Home Depot for $11 and $17 respectively. A metal spigot (essentially just an outdoor tap) costs about $10, probably less, and is more durable than the plastic one on the CT barrel. A screen to keep bugs out will cost maybe $2 at most, though I might already have that. I also already have silicone caulk to assemble it. My goal is to spend no more than $50 ($30 ideally) on the entire project to build a usable rain barrel. I might have to set up eves and a downspout for where I want to put it but I'm not factoring that into the cost of the project since the CT barrel assumes you already have that in place. Why am I doing this? No, I haven't gone to the green dark side. It's more of a proof of theory that the green industry is a huge scam. Of course I'll update my progress as I go along.
read more...

Thursday, April 09, 2009

Wasting Green on Green: Green Charity Scams

World Wildlife Fund is gearing up to do it's annual CN Tower Stair Climb later this month. This event used to be in support of the United Way but that changed somewhere in the last couple of years. The WWF stair climb is to fight global warming while the United Way fights poverty and homelessness in the city. Neither are big concerns to me but I find the latter to be a far more noble cause than the former. This has got me thinking about the recent surge in the number of "green" charities. The WWF has led this bandwagon. Greenpeace is now said to rake in over a billion dollars in donations. What is this money being spent on? Well, they certainly aren't doing what you'd think a legitimate charity would do. It's not going to help people who need it. It goes to a lot of pipe dream pet projects that the group's members think will stop climate change. People in Africa need AIDS vaccines and access to clean water, not solar panels. I think it's shameful for someone to give to a green charity rather than spending it on legitimate humanitarian aid projects. If you want to donate money, I suggest giving it to people such as the Red Cross or medical charities. I'm personally a supporter of Heart & Stroke Canada and The Diabetes Association of Canada, and I gave to the Red Cross during the Katrina disaster. Rather than donating your money to the stair climb for global warming, please instead donate it to the disaster victims in the recent Italian Earthquake Disaster and Manitoba Floods. You'll be putting a smile on someone's face right when they need it the most.
read more...

Wednesday, April 01, 2009

How Tough Times Breed Radicalism

Many people are perplexed as to how someone like Adolf Hitler could rise to power and commit so many atrocities virtually unchecked during his rule over Germany from 1933 to 1945. Hitler was an evil man most certainly but he was not the cause of Germany's problems, he was a symptom. The social and governmental problems that eventually culminated in the Second World War and the Holocaust had been festering for years; from the time when young Adolf was still doing paintings for spare change on the streets of Vienna. Sudden and catastrophic economic collapse opened the door for the relatively obscure political to take the German nation by the horns and drag it into its pit of destruction. The risk for democracies becomes apparent when all other mainstream sources have been exhausted, as happened when the country experienced its own devastating recessions through Hyper Inflation in the 1920s and later the Great Depression of the 30s. Hitler did what he had promised. He pulled Germany out of the depression before any other nation, but the consequences were dire. It's important to note though that Germany was still a relatively young and inexperienced democracy in 1933 and that Hitler's NSDAP never received a majority in the Reichstag. He was handed power by the country's incompetent president.
There are more recent examples though that should serve as a warning. Take Venezuela into consideration. It is a relatively old and stable democracy. It was one of only two nations within Latin America that never underwent a period of dictatorship, military or otherwise, during the turbulent second half of the 20th century. (The other being Costa Rica) Then in 1992, a radical young military officer named Hugo Chavez Frias attempted to launch a coup against the democratic government. The coup failed but Chavez was legitimately elected president of Venezuela in 1998. The switch to his radical Fifth Republic movement had been brought on by failures of the Liberal and Conservative parties in regards to stopping corruption and alleviating the countries long festering poverty and other social issues. Since his term in office, Chavez has steadily removed democratic freedoms including stifling opposition press such as RCTV and reforming the constitution to allow him to run indefinitely. As the continuing recession plummeted oil prices, he began to curb private property rights after loosing funding from the country's only viable export. Chavez is not a dictator, not yet anyway, but one cannot help make parallels between him and other radicals such as Hitler.

Most first world countries have managed to escape the scourges of home grown fascism and radical socialism during tough economic times. However, to think that Canada and the United States are immune to it is foolish. When Franklin Delano Roosevelt came to power, he had a set plan for fixing the economy. He was charismatic and gave people hope. Barack Obama ran his campaign on similar themes but lacked that set plan that was FDR's New Deal. It has become painfully obvious that Obama does not know what to do and has spent more time on other issues. In Canada, Steven Harper's Conservatives are following pretty much the same path, waiting for the US to react before making any decisions. The United States had said a resounding no to the Republicans' plans and the Liberals within Canada also lack anything concrete. With voter turnouts reaching historical lows in Canada, there is a serious risk of a crisis of legitimacy among the major parties. When people believe the mainstream parties are not acting to help them, they will seek out alternative means to vent their frustrations. This is evident with the strong support British RESPECT MP George Galloway has received. He is a raving antisemite and communist but people line up to hear him speak. For these kinds of people, the chances have never been better to gobble up seats within the House of Commons. Britons are hugely dissatisfied with Brown's Labour government and don't seem too keen on the Conservatives either. Britain has been on the decline for some time now. London is currently holding the G20 summit and the usual communist/anarchist groups have appeared to protest. However, police and officials have admitted they're surprised by the how violent the crowd is this time and sheer number of people who have showed up.
You will also see the increasing popularity of nationalist and fundamentalist movements. Radical Islam has been growing at a steady rate and a weakening America, in their eyes, confirms their belief that the "empire" has been destined by Allah to collapse. B'nai Brith is claiming that they have also seen a rise in antisemitism since the start of the recession. The hey day of the second Ku Klux Klan was during the depression of the 1930s. Although Islamic-supremacy movements have largely replaced white supremacists as the dominant racist organizations, skin head movements, particularly in Alberta, also seem to be making a comeback. These groups obtained notoriety in the 1980s during another particularly bad recession. Last month, they were involved in violent clashes with anti-racist groups and were sespected in the senseless random beating of a Japanese woman in Calgary. For many if not most, it's easier to point fingers than attempt to tackle the issues, or admit fault for your own problems.

A great man, Benjamin Franklin, once said that those who trade essential liberty for a little security deserve neither liberty nor security. I'm not going to make some prophetic predictions regarding all this. In all likelihood, this recession will not collapse our world order and will not send us into World War Three, or put us under the thumb of dictatorship. However, it is possible and it is a risk that needs to be addressed sooner rather than later. There already is a growing threat from radical fringe groups who have been waiting for an event like this to present their cases as being viable alternatives. Democratic governments and mainstream politicians need to act now to regain the confidence of their people, or else this nightmare scenario could indeed become reality.
read more...

Friday, March 20, 2009

No Sir, I don't Like It

Classic Ren & Stimpy moment that pretty much sums up politics today.
read more...

Sunday, January 18, 2009

This Song Goes Out To Obama...

Being a fan of South Park, this song by Issac Hayes couldn't help but remind me of Obama and how the mainstream media treats him. Boom baby.

read more...

Friday, July 25, 2008

Obnoxious Buzz Words

Over the years, you're bound to hear a lot of stupid stuff. Lord knows some of that stuff has probably come out of your mouth more frequently than you'd like to admit. I know it has from mine. The English language is a curious one. It's probably one of the least complex European languages to speak and write but it has all sorts of odd words and phrases that get mixed in. Middle-management types like to make up words. Some of them are annoying or downright obnoxious. They're called buzz words. Words that make stupid people sound smarter than they really are. So therefore, I've compiled a list of these buzz words and phrases that I'm really sick of hearing.

1. Carbon Footprint
This is a fairly recent invention. I first started hearing it in early 2007. Each summer I jokingly resolve to increase it given my interest in RC motor sports. The phrase is designed to give the image of a huge boot print but what it really means is how much carbon dioxide that you, as an individual produce each year. It's combined with imagery, such as one with a giant shoe print superimposed on a picture of the Earth. The image is designed to demonize people by making them think they're literally stomping on the environment each time they get in their non-hybrid car.

2. Green
Environmental buzzwords are popular these days. This one is an oldie though. I personally first started hearing this in the early 90s though it's probably much older than that. People associate the colour green with plants, which they associate with nature. Green has become an obnoxious buzzword by its sheer overuse in today's language. Green cleaners, green car, green energy, Green Shift, green vomit.

3. Islamophobia
This term developed after 9/11. It comes from the Greek root word phobia, which according to Wikipedia (which is my bible) is an irrational persistent fear of situations, activities, things, or persons. The term phobia is a clinical one which stems from anxiety disorders but it has been corrupted for non-clinical uses. As the word suggests, Islamophobia is an (claimed) irrational fear of Muslims or Muslim culture. Muslims usually use it as a force field to shield their religion from any sort of criticism. It frequently popped up in the Mark Styne fiasco. University students' unions love this word. I wonder if World War 2 had occurred today, would Winston Churchill be considered Deutschophobic?

4. Israeli Apartheid
Another term popular with students' unions, it tries to link the current Israel's treatment of Palestinians with South Africa's treatment of blacks during the Apartheid era. I don't ever recall Nelson Mandela shooting up schools or mowing down civilians with a bulldozer though. It's designed to bring up very negative, genocide-esque images of what's going on with Palestine but it corrupts the reality of the situation, which is a civil war. Apartheid and civil war are not the same thing. South Africans should be offended at the use (or rather abuse) of this phrase.

5. Colonialism
Some would like to suggest that all the world's problems from 1492 up to present were the sole cause of white, European men raping and pillaging. This is another term that frequently pops up in universities, especially in history or political science courses. The notion that all white people are is racist and all they do is go out and attack foreign lands and enslave their citizens is in itself racist. It's conveniently forgotten that China, Japan, and the Muslim world had colonies of their own at one point. Spain was once a Muslim colony up until shortly before the age of Columbus. Generally, this term is more frequently used with globalization to denote how the US is supposedly taking over the world as a neo-colonial power. It's another tired hack phrase used by non-democratic countries and people who can't get their own houses in shape and need an easy scapegoat.

6. Obamania
Barak Obama is this generation's John F Kennedy. He's huge in the US. Not only may he be the first black president, but people love him. In his recent trip to Europe, he received a rock stars reception. It's a little odd that a politician would be making foreign visits during an election rather than campaigning in his own country. The media has dubbed his popularity as Obamania, a combination of Obama and Mania, suggesting that people are crazy about him. Obviously the media has stolen this from Trudeaumania of the 1970s. Trudeau was a popular and charismatic individual like Obama, he also turned Canada into a laughing stock during his years as PM. We're still trying to fix the mess. Makes you think twice about Barak.

7. FUD
This appears often on tech forums, and is usually misused. It's an acronym for spreading Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt. Pointing out flaws of a product, person, or idea is frequently labelled as FUD by people who want to quickly dismiss debate. Sometimes appears in politics. I prefer my own FUD acronym for people who use this annoying term: F-ed Upped Dummies

8. Queer
Sometimes words can take on two meanings. Queer is a now archaic word in English meaning something is odd or strange. It's now used to describe anything and everything that has to do with homosexuals. Ironically, the word was once used as a putdown for gays but they've since "made it their own." Queer TV, queer bar, queer person, queer rights. This word alone is more irritating than anything else. Makes me glad I'm strait and therefore I don't have to use it to describe myself. This word, along with gay, needs to be taken back from homosexuals and restored to its original, non-corrupted meaning. Also, can we please get rid of that tasteless parade, or at least get some better looking lesbians in it. You're here, you're queer, we are used to it. Now put your pants back on.

9. Human Resources
Nothing really political about this term but it's still a buzzword that bothers me. It replaced personnel in the office world. The Human Resources department is of course in charge of hiring and firing. The thing I don't like about this term is how highly impersonal it is. It makes you seem as though you're no different from the plastic or steel being put into the product your making. Personnel on the other hand gives the image of dealing with people, not objects. Human resources is not exactly a PC term so it's a mystery as to how it became popular.

10: Awareness
I'm not entirely sure when people first started using this term but it seems it's getting thrown around a lot lately. It's used mostly by the left wing, they being the kings of buzzwords. It's particularly popular with left leaning NGOs like WWF and and Greenpeace. It basically means to make people "aware" of particular global issues. Of course making people aware usually means telling people only your distorted view of the issue. Awareness tends to be just another propaganda method than anything else.

11: Solidarity
An old term, popular with unions and independence groups. It means uniting to fight a specific force. Polish Solidarity is a classic historical example. However, lazy left wingers and general "do gooders" like to use their term to feel good about themselves. "I'm in solidarity with (insert oppressed minority group)!" No you're not you moron. Most of the people who make these claims are urban hipsters who have never even left downtown Toronto once in their lives. They love to use their term to make themselves feel connected with groups they feel are being oppressed, but what it really means is "I feel for you, but Arrested Development is on so you're on your own".

12. Fair Trade
At first, you first started seeing this phrase as upscale chain coffee houses like Starbucks. What it supposedly means is that the coffee buyer (the chain) paid a third world farmer a fair market rate for their product. The whole idea is to uplift the poor farming class out of poverty. This is yet another concept to make white, urban hipsters feel good about themselves each time they decadently pay $5 for a small (excuse me, tall) double mocha latte. The exact meaning of fair trade is a bit of a mystery since nobody outside these big companies knows what a fair value for coffee is. The whole irony is that fair trade really doesn't do much. Juan Valdez can make several times the money growing coca than growing coffee. Coca, or more specifically it's refined form cocaine, is of course another favourite product of urban hipsters. Buying the drugs keeps them under the thumb of the drug lords and no amount of "fair trade" coffee is going to change that. I've started seeing this term being used on other products.

13. Elitist
We supposedly live in an elitist society. Those who run our country, rich white men, are the elites. This term gets kicked around a lot, and like Islamophobia, it's used to shield the negative activities of certain groups from criticism. Elitists don't necessarily have to be white men. For example, when Bill Cosby spoke out against family issues plaguing African American society, he was labelled an elitist by black leaders. It's designed to make more successful people in our society appear out of touch with the lower classes, despite many of them coming from humble beginnings. Those who succeed often take the role of iconoclasts, especially if that person comes from a minority group who has convinced themselves they are being kept down by "the man". White socialists also like this term for the same reasons.

14. Nazi
Oh, boy. This has to be the grand poohba of left wing buzz words. It is the most commonly misused political word I can personally think of. George W Bush has frequently been called a Nazi over his past 8 year term. Of course, who could forget when university professor Ward Churchill called the 9/11 victims "little Eichmanns". The flagrant use of the term Nazi truly diminishes the reality of what the NSDAP did during it's reign over Germany from 1933 to 1945. The people who conquered lands, devastated Europe, and systematically murdered 6 million Jews and other minorities. Whether you agree or disagree with Bush's policies, I think any sane person who knows their history can say he's certainly not a Nazi. The term is generally misused to refer to any authority figure one does not like.

15. Initiative
I hear this a lot when discussing anything related with the city of Toronto. "We're developing a new transit initiative" or "We're working on the waterfront initiative". The Oxford American Dictionary has two definitions that fit the use of this buzzword. The first being "the power or opportunity to act or take charge before others do." The second is "an act or strategy intended to resolve a difficulty or improve a situation, a fresh approach to something." In the city's eyes, what this means is going to the province and the feds, hat in hand, looking for money from grandiose projects. It's not really taking initiative at all since they want someone else to do it for them. The word works though because it makes stupid people think someone is doing something for them when they really aren't.


So there you have it. 15 annoying and obnoxious terms that get all too frequently kicked around. You might be asking why most are left wing terms. The right does like to use buzzwords too but I find not as frequently. Most of these terms are ones that pop up most often in the media. Of course, I'll add more as I come across them in later postings.

Updated Aug 16/08

16. Sustainable:
The environmental movement has tons of great obnoxious buzzwords to choose from. Sustainable is a popular one that's popped up in the last couple of years. It basically means that you are using pollution free energy (wind & solar) which can be sustained without limit, or that you are using environmentally friendly products to sustain the environment. Truth be known, it's mostly an expensive marketing ploy for "eco-friendly" products and to sell overpriced solar panels for yuppies to mount on their roof.

17. Poverty:
Poverty is a very serious issue in the developing world. That I don't dispute. What really grinds my gears, as Peter Griffin would say, is its use in developed nations. The problem with the word poverty is that there is no set global definition for the term. It's kind of offensive to equate someone living in public housing Jane & Finch though with someone in South America living in a cardboard shack. Apparently anyone who makes under $20,000 is impoverished in Canada. Ironically, it's quite possible for someone living under the poverty line to live quite comfortable. Take my Grandma for example, who earns a pension less than that. Also don't forget that Canadians are entitled to "free" health care and social services that truly impoverished people are not. The word poverty suggests extreme poorness. Therefore I peg it at less than $2 per day with little hope for improvement. In Canada, almost nobody falls under that category. We wiped out poverty in our country decades ago so please stop using this term.
read more...

Friday, February 15, 2008

Family Day Fraud

Back during the 2007 provincial election, I laughed at McGuinty's Family Day. Well, it's now coming up this Monday and a lot of debate is stirring over it. 40% of Ontarians will not be getting it off. As for myself, it replaces an existing holiday that was scheduled before Family Day was announced. So technically, I don't consider myself as getting Family Day off.

The issue was first brought up by the Toronto police services who noted that they were the only people on city staff who would not be getting the holiday. Other people not getting the day off include contracted union workers, retail staff, and many others in the private sector. Businesses had little time to prepare and adjust contracts so a lot of people have either the choice of working or not getting paid. The holiday itself is corrupt in its nature. It was brought up when McGuinty was starting to dip in the polls as a vote buying measure. A number of foolish Canadians seem to have bought his game but for the rest of us, tough luck. It seems to me to be more of a holiday for civil servants and school teachers. This group of people already gets more time off than anybody else. Days they get off that nobody else does include Remembrance Day, Boxing Day, the day after New Years, and Christmas Eve. Now they have one more to add to this longest list. I think we should give Family Day the boot. I personally refuse to celebrate a holiday that was created for purely corrupt political reasons. To me, it makes more sense to add a holiday in June instead of the middle of winter, since what's there to do in February?
read more...

Monday, January 01, 2007

Reflections on 2006, Thoughts for 2007

The world greets 2007 today. One year over and another begins. 2006 was certainly an interesting year to be alive in. We saw the Conservatives rise to power for the first time in 13 years. The Democratic party took control of congress in the US. Saddam Hussain was finally executed for his crimes. War in Lebanon, natural disasters, the deaths of many big names in recent history. It's amazing how much we can cram into 365 days, whether for good or bad.

I think we should look at 2007 on a positive outlook. Recent polls done in the United States show Americans fear an approaching dooms day. For some reason though, I highly doubt the second coming of Jesus is in the cards for the next year. I predict we've still got a solid 5 billion years before we have to worry about the end of the world. So what are my predictions?
-Weather will return to normal with the end of the El Nino cycle, ending global warming fears.
-No chance for peace in the Middle-East but with Saddam Hussain out of the picture in Iraq, at least there will still be hope for that country.
-There will be no terror attacks on US soil this year. Terrorism world-wide will be below normal this year.
-Fidel Castro will die. Cuba will either become democratic or adopt post-Mao Chinese style "communism". US Embargo against Cuba will end.
-Canada will not go to the polls for another Federal election as predicted by some political scientists. With Canada's two biggest provinces already going to the polls for provincial elections, opposition parties will likely hold off until early 2008, or face voter backlash. Dalton McGuinty will (unfortunately) win the Ontario provincial election but will only hold a minority government.
-Caledonia will not be resolved. The OPP will be sued over it.
-Milton will fall further into the sinkhole it dug itself.
read more...